| |
 |
|
| |
|
GSD
Cutting Room
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
In addition to the
application of GSD in the make-up environment, the system can be applied
in the Cutting Room |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Benchmarking
and Productivity in the Cutting Room |
| |
|
|
| |
|
The
Problem… |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Whilst
many professional organisations are more than willing to commit to accurate
and frequent measurement of the tasks and operations that occur in the sewing
room, few are as willing to do so where cutting related activities are concerned.
And yet the cutting room is a key element in the manufacturing process,
just as important as any other department involved in the successful delivery
of goods. The activities in the cutting environment are just as susceptible
to inefficiency, low productivity and poor motivation. So, why is there
a reluctance to measure what undoubtedly needs to be measured? Many reasons: |
| |
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
- Because the
comparatively short cycle work in the sewing room is easy to measure,
whilst the activities in the cutting room are long and complex.
Accurate assessment of cutting room activities can also therefore
be equally long and complex, and measurement of these activities
subsequently becomes an arduous task in itself.
- Additionally,
the longer the task the greater the opportunity for error when
measuring, compiling and computing the “Standard Time” for that
given activity.
|
|
| |
|
Accurate
assessment of cutting activities is therefore perceived to be difficult
to achieve, and many organisations question the value of committing valuable
human resource to the lengthy task of work measurement in this area. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Equally,
the complex calculations related to “frequency of occurrence”, and the difficulties
associated to accurate assessment of an operators “performance” (“performance”
being far more difficult to “rate” when a given task contains long and multiple
elements) may also raise questions as to the accuracy of the final results
compiled. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
The number
of variations experienced within the cutting room (lay depth, length of
lay, number of garments per lay, ratio of garments per lay etc… etc… ) can
and often do render the results of any earlier measurements inaccurate for
that altered state. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Put simply,
many organisations see the expense of committing valuable human resource
to the lengthy task of measuring cutting activities as ineffective use of
that resource. Particularly when measurement of other work areas may be
more “productive”, yielding more results, more quickly (this is a common
perception, but measurement of the other areas will not necessarily have
the same positive effect on output and profitability!) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
All good
excuses for not wanting to measure activities in the cutting room, but not
good reasons! Again the question “Why?”…… |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Why are
they not good reasons? Because the cutting room is the heart of any factory,
and if it can’t deliver the right quantities at the right time, then all
other activities will eventually suffer or at worst come to a halt. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
So, an
accurate benchmark (and the reliable measurement of efficiency and productivity
that stems from that benchmark) is just as important in the cutting environment
as any other department in the factory. In summary, measurement and motivation
are as critical in this area as in any other (perhaps, it could be argued,
even more so). The need therefore is to find an acceptable means of measurement. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
The
Solution…? |
| |
|
|
| |
|
If one
accepts that for these reasons measurement in the cutting room is necessary,
one has to examine how that measurement can be undertaken. Conventional
measurement techniques have all too often proven to be unsuccessful for
all the “excuses” given earlier. Conventional Techniques are time consuming,
often inaccurate and very difficult to adjust when the need arises. The
need therefore arises for an alternative means of measurement in this area,
a measurement technique that is consistent and accurate, and which provides
a database of information that is dynamic and malleable enough to accommodate
the variations that occur in the cutting environment (without sacrificing
consistency and accuracy). |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Pre-Determined
Motion Time Systems (PMTS) have, for many years been, recognised as just
that, consistent, accurate and dynamic in a changing environment. PMTS rely
on pre-determined times for known activities at known performance levels,
and can therefore accurately predict best method and the optimum time for
a given task. They provide a known benchmark and in so doing provide an
accurate measure of performance, efficiency and output. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Add the
qualities of a tried and tested PMTS to those of a well designed software
package that is able to accommodate complex mathematical calculations, and
one begins to move toward a solution to the problem of work measurement
in the cutting environment. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
GSD (the
PMTS designed for the clothing industry and a system which has served that
industry for over 25 years) and GSD Scimitar Software (written specifically
to manage the extensive data required for and to compute the variables encountered
in the cutting room) provides exactly that solution. The combination of
the two, system and software, provides a level of integrity and accuracy
against which one is able to measure day to day activities in the complex
environment that is the cutting room. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
The
Solution…! |
| |
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
“GSD Scimitar”
for Cutting Room, offered under licence by GSD (Corporate) Ltd is
a Windows based software system, which has been developed specifically
for ease of application within the Cutting Room environment. Incorporating
the integrity of the GSD database and the very best in logical and
dynamic software design, GSD Scimitar provides the solution to work
measurement in the cutting arena. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
GSD Scimitar
ensures consistent and accurate Time Standards for the cutting room, and
eliminates the need for time consuming and costly conventional study work. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
At the
initial stage, the GSD database is used to measure existing practices, and
to then improve upon those practices to promote best method and ensure highest
productivity levels. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Once a
“base line” has been set, and a full set of data has been created for your
unique environment, benchmarking becomes easier and easier. The pyramid
data structure inherent within the software provides easy access to information
and enables the user to predict the effect on Standard Time of the variable
elements such as lay length, ply depth, garments per lay, geometric variance,
type of spreader, type of cutter…. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
GSD Scimitar
covers all activities in the cutting and preparation areas of manufacturing,
including:- |
| |
|
|
| |
|
- Fabric Inspection
- Preparation
- table, fabric, equipment
- Pleating
- Cloth Spreading
- Manual
- Cloth Spreading
- Automatic
- Ripping
- Cutting -
Shears
- Cutting -
Straight Knife
- Cutting -
Circular Knife
- Cutting -
Automatic/Computerised
- Cutting -
Band Knife
- Cutting -
Die
- Marking In
- Manual
- Quality/Panel
Checking
- Fusing
- Numbering
- Sorting
- Waste Disposal
|
|
 |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
The process
of data construction is similar to that used when applying GSD in the sewing
room, and speed of analysis is similar. GSD Scimitar will provide: |
| |
|
|
| |
|
1. Accurate, consistent
method and time standards in a fraction of the time taken by conventional
measurement techniques.
2. A set of GSD
Data Blocks, which describe the common activities in the cutting room
and which can be modified to meet with the needs of each unique environment.
3. The capability
to analyse all operations within any Cutting Room.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
GSD Scimitar
enables the user to compile Standard Time for individuals, groups of workers,
or indeed for costing purposes. Data is stored for subsequent use and can
be edited at the users’ discretion. GSD Scimitar, facilitates the dynamic
construction of benchmark data, which is then easily modified to adapt to
the ever changing requirements of the user and Cutting Room alike. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
With specialised
formulae to accommodate spreading machinery and cutting equipment, GSD Scimitar
is used to generate detailed methods analyses and time standards in conjunction
with pattern blocks and material specifications. Fast and accurate, GSD
Scimitar is adaptable to all of the variables faced in day-to-day cutting
operations and is both reactive and proactive in minimising problems. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
The
Matrix |
| |
|
|
| |
|
When benchmarks
and Standard Times have been established for key operations, GSD Scimitar
enables the user to generate matrices of standard times for cloth spreading
and cutting, taking account of different lay parameters. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
The “Matrix”
within GSD Scimitar uses a base operation analysis and re-calculates
the Standard Time for similar operations using the variables of lay
length and depth. Increments for lay length and depth are simply entered
by the user and the calculation process initiated. From any GSD Scimitar
operation Standards Time can be produced for the given variables,
thereby eliminating the need to measure and produce individual time
standards for every operation. Accurate standards are therefore available
in minutes rather than in hours/days. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Variations
taken account of within the Matrix are as follows: |
| |
|
|
| |
|
- Preparation
- Setting Up
- Administration
- Fabric Width
- Fabric Types
- Fabric Spreading
Methods
- Breaks in
Rolls
- Stepped Lays
- Length of
Lay
- Number of
Plies
- Ratio of
Sizes
- Marker Types
- Cutting Methods
- Straight
Distances Cut
- Curved Distances
Cut
- Notches Cut
- Corners Cut
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
GSD Scimitar,
when added to GSD Sewing, provides a single data source of Standard Time
for each step of the manufacturing process, from fabric inspection through
cutting, sewing, examination, packing and despatch. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
GSD Scimitar
fills the current void in the compilation of easily managed time standards
within the Cutting Room. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
The complete
suite of GSD systems not only provides for the development of method analyses
and operation standards, but also encompasses an initial product cost analysis,
including labour, materials and overhead costs, with “first attempt” line
balancing for manpower and machinery. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|